Election 2008, language, Politics

Candidates should avoid ‘royal we’

Am I the only one annoyed when presidential candidates refer to themselves as “we” instead of “I“? For example: “We will continue to work hard in New Hampshire…”

The usage is known as the “royal we or “editorial we and the speakers may be doing it out of habit, or in deference to their campaign workers, or in an effort to ingratiate themselves with their audiences. Or maybe just to avoid taking personal responsibility for what they are saying.

They all do it, and they should stop. We the voters will be electing a single individual to the office of president. When candidates speak, they should own their words, their intent, their promises. I want to hear “I think,” not “We think,” “I will,” not “We will.”

Say what you mean and mean what you say. It’s not that hard.

About PiedType

Old editors never die, they just revert to type

Discussion

No comments yet.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

pied wooden type

Hic Sunt Dracones

This Is Colorado

'Stormy Peaks Over Bierstadt' by Eric Stensland

'Stormy Peaks Over Bierstadt' by Eric Stensland, Morning Light Phtotography, Estes Park, Colorado. Lake Bierstadt is in Rocky Mountain National Park.

Enter your email address to receive new post alerts via email:

Subscribe Via Twitter

Click to get new post alerts via Twitter:
Follow PiedType on Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers