<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And you thought the Olympics were about sports! Ha!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://piedtype.com/2008/08/19/and-you-thought-the-olympics-were-about-sports-ha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://piedtype.com/2008/08/19/and-you-thought-the-olympics-were-about-sports-ha/</link>
	<description>Old editors never die, they just revert to type</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "type" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://piedtype.com/2008/08/19/and-you-thought-the-olympics-were-about-sports-ha/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recent Links Tagged With "type" - JabberTags]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piedtype.wordpress.com/?p=1698#comment-1421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] public links &gt;&gt; type   And you thought the Olympics were about sports! Ha! Saved by julians on Sat 01-11-2008   Google Insight For Search - Finding Trends In Specific Region, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; type   And you thought the Olympics were about sports! Ha! Saved by julians on Sat 01-11-2008   Google Insight For Search &#8211; Finding Trends In Specific Region, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://piedtype.com/2008/08/19/and-you-thought-the-olympics-were-about-sports-ha/#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piedtype.wordpress.com/?p=1698#comment-1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely spot-on. I can&#039;t stand NBC&#039;s Olympics coverage (see my website for my article on such). I really wish my cable provider carried CBC.
___________
&lt;em&gt;As in Canadian Broadcasting Company? I used to watch that all the time when I lived in NY. But I was just across the lake from them then.&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely spot-on. I can&#8217;t stand NBC&#8217;s Olympics coverage (see my website for my article on such). I really wish my cable provider carried CBC.<br />
___________<br />
<em>As in Canadian Broadcasting Company? I used to watch that all the time when I lived in NY. But I was just across the lake from them then.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockwoodcomic</title>
		<link>http://piedtype.com/2008/08/19/and-you-thought-the-olympics-were-about-sports-ha/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rockwoodcomic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piedtype.wordpress.com/?p=1698#comment-1146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It IS wonderful that someone thought to do this kind of coverage.  Of course, I thought so eight years ago when I first started doing it...

http://www.rockwoodcomic.com/olywatch/2008/

...but to be fair to Slate, although they did copy my idea, I didn&#039;t have a meter.  Next time, maybe!

--Brian
_____________
&lt;em&gt;Probably being done in one form or another in a zillion places. Slate&#039;s just happened to be the one I was referred to. Kudos to everyone for covering NBC&#039;s Lympics the way they deserve to be covered.&lt;/em&gt; ;)

&lt;em&gt;Just peeked at your blog and you have the stats I was wondering about -- fluff &#039;n&#039; stuff vs. actual sports coverage. I owe NBC an apology; it&#039;s NOT a 50/50 split.&lt;/em&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It IS wonderful that someone thought to do this kind of coverage.  Of course, I thought so eight years ago when I first started doing it&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rockwoodcomic.com/olywatch/2008/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rockwoodcomic.com/olywatch/2008/</a></p>
<p>&#8230;but to be fair to Slate, although they did copy my idea, I didn&#8217;t have a meter.  Next time, maybe!</p>
<p>&#8211;Brian<br />
_____________<br />
<em>Probably being done in one form or another in a zillion places. Slate&#8217;s just happened to be the one I was referred to. Kudos to everyone for covering NBC&#8217;s Lympics the way they deserve to be covered.</em> <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><em>Just peeked at your blog and you have the stats I was wondering about &#8212; fluff &#8216;n&#8217; stuff vs. actual sports coverage. I owe NBC an apology; it&#8217;s NOT a 50/50 split.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://piedtype.com/2008/08/19/and-you-thought-the-olympics-were-about-sports-ha/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piedtype.wordpress.com/?p=1698#comment-1145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a bad &#039;Merican. I haven&#039;t watched one single second of the Olympics. It just hasn&#039;t been the same since they let professional athletes compete. 

Yeah, I haven&#039;t watched them for years.
__________
&lt;em&gt;Tsk, tsk. Din&#039;t you know it&#039;s yur dooty to watch the Lympics!? 

But you have a good excuse. You&#039;ve been a wee bit busy lately.&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bad &#8216;Merican. I haven&#8217;t watched one single second of the Olympics. It just hasn&#8217;t been the same since they let professional athletes compete. </p>
<p>Yeah, I haven&#8217;t watched them for years.<br />
__________<br />
<em>Tsk, tsk. Din&#8217;t you know it&#8217;s yur dooty to watch the Lympics!? </p>
<p>But you have a good excuse. You&#8217;ve been a wee bit busy lately.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

