Helen Thomas: Gone in 60 seconds

9 thoughts on “Helen Thomas: Gone in 60 seconds”

  1. Although you’d think that Helen Thomas’ years of experience would have caused her pause in being so candid answering a question centered around a volatile subject like Israel’s recent questionable actions in international waters, for some reason she chose to be brutally honest. Journalists are expected to deliver news in a dispassionate manner devoid of personal bias, and to protect the perceived lack of bias they’re also expected to keep quiet about personal beliefs until after they’ve retired.

    This time, she was on the other side of the cameras and microphones and being interviewed rather than being the interviewer and for some reason imagined herself immune to the fallout of a controversial sound bite, the likes of which she has spent years trying to get from others. On the other hand…

    We all know that every person… even if they’re journalists – have bias, or a preference regarding most issues. Most of the time we’re expected to guess the bias of news anchors and reporters and most of the time it’s fairly easy to do. Especially when it comes to TV personalities who work in their network’s news departments.

    Whether you agree with Thomas’ opinion or not, it’s unique that we no longer have to guess about her personal feelings regarding Israel’s problems with Palestine. In my opinion, the truth is that Ms. Thomas had to know that news consumers are REQUIRED to guess. Unless she’s retired. Maybe she was ready to do just that and decided to go out with a newsworthy bang.

    My advice would have been for her to take this secret to the grave.

    1. My advice as well. I’m sure this will end her career, and it’s a shame to have such a long, illustrious career end like this. I just can’t imagine why she decided to do it. She had to know what the reaction would be. She could have retired gracefully and then spoken out like she did, on TV or in a book or something. But not while she’s on someone else’s payroll. Some sources say she was ambushed, but I don’t think she’s that dumb and she clearly knew the camera was on. ‘Tis a puzzlement.

  2. I take an overarching view of this: It’s just more evidence that the world would be better off without religion. No religion, less stupidity to fight about, no problem in the Middle East.

... and that's my two cents