Titanic small by today’s standards

7 thoughts on “Titanic small by today’s standards”

  1. I had seen this photo before, and had visited the Titanic museum in Branson (MO) as well as seen the movies and Broadway musical– but the sizes struck home a couple weeks ago. My brother & SIL were on the Oasis for a week. She loved it; he said it was too big. Too many people. And mature trees in a park do not belong on a boat, thank you (his words). I enjoy cruising so far (Alaska- Glacier Bay) but that monster has no appeal. Oh, when they disembarked (Port Canaveral), their package trip sent them directly to Disneyworld. He may still be sitting in their barn to recover from all the crowds of people. 🙂

    1. I was really stunned by the difference. I’ve no interest in a ship like the Oasis. Seriously, mature trees in a park!? I want a ship/boat that feels like a watercraft. I love sailing, with the waves slapping the hull, the rigging creaking, the wind and spray in my face. Without them, what’s the point of being on the water? I might enjoy the smaller coastal ships like you were on. Or the river cruises in Europe. But the ocean-going behemoths that call themselves ships? No thanks.

  2. These new gigantic ships remind me of the livestock carriers that one sees at some ports in Australia.

    The only difference is that these monsters have balconies for their sheep and cattle to sit in; which would be a necessity when you think about it, how else to get away from the throng crowding the shops and bars and casino’s on these vessels, plus the incessant noise from the ‘entertainment’ people.

    Somewhat like a Billy Butlin holiday home of Great Britain after WWII, only on the water and moving through the seas.

    There is nothing that remotely resembles the style, and class of those ocean liners of yesteryear. They are built with the sole intent of extracting money from the purses and pockets of the gullible .

    I like them not! 👿

... and that's my two cents