Words fail

(AP Photo/Thibault Camus) (Thibault Camus)

19 comments

    1. Historically, architecturally, artistically, and culturally, it is unique and beyond value. A world treasure, not just a French treasure. How it was originally financed is a small part of its overall story. What was destroyed can be rebuilt, but won’t be the same. What’s gone is gone. In time this will just become part of the cathedral’s continuing story.

      1. To think of all the craftsmen and artists who worked on Notre Dame in all of its centuries of construction, working on a structure whose completion they would never see, similar to planting a tree under whose shade you’ll never sit. I hope that same level of devotion and craftsmanship happens again.

        1. Surely they will bring in and/or consult the world’s best. Or at least, the best of those willing to devote the time. Devotion and craftsmanship may be harder to come by these days.

  1. Hate to be a spoiler but I’ve been wondering why the bloke the church was built for let it burn.
    There are better cathedrals in England I believe, and quite a bit older too.
    The Durham cathedral was started in William the Conks time and is the only one left of that period.

    1. I’m not well informed on cathedrals in general. I just happened to have seen and read enough about this one to appreciate its architectural significance. The destruction or damage of any great historical/cultural structures always saddens me.

Leave a Reply to LordBeariOfBow Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s