Yep, that’s Justin Bieber in the photo, but I’m not writing specifically about him. Frankly I don’t even like him. The topic here is his hair, his dreadlocks, dreds, or locs. It’s created quite a controversy recently because, many claim, it constitutes “cultural appropriation.”
Oh, gasp! Personally, I dismiss cries of cultural appropriation. Maybe that’s just because I’m an old, possibly un-woke white woman. I try to be aware and keep up with what’s going on around me, but I just can’t sympathize with complaints about cultural appropriation.
I was raised to think of America as a melting pot, where all the inhabitants just blend together into homogeneous Americans. Since then, of course, it’s become apparent and understandable that people might want to honor and preserve their cultural heritage, whatever it might be. And that’s fine. But I don’t think anyone has a patent on or an exclusive right to their traditions and styles (with the notable exception of religious ceremonies, objects, and raiments).
I was also raised to think that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. If I dress like you, it’s because I like the way you dress. If I adopt your hairstyle, it’s because I admire your hairstyle. In fact, back in the ’70s, I did exactly that — along with many of my female friends. We all got really curly perms — Afros if you will, although I never thought of it that way. It was just a cute, new, very easy-to-maintain hairstyle. And as best I can remember, I never heard the term “cultural appropriation.” I suppose others, then and now, would accuse me of that.
Today I am hearing the term more often, but I still don’t have much sympathy for the sentiment. After all, what is it when Black people straighten their hair? I’m not going to have a hissy fit about it. My hair is pathetically straight, but if you like the look, go for it.
Jazz and reggae originated in Black communities but are loved and have spread throughout American culture. Is that cultural appropriation? What about St. Patrick’s Day when “everybody’s Irish”?
What about team mascots? These days some of them are not considered “politically correct.” So we’re not supposed to name our sports teams “Chiefs,” “Indians,” “Braves,” or “Redskins.” I understand the latter is a derogatory term used by early settlers in the West. But the other names were probably adopted because the teams admired them and wanted to think of themselves as brave fighters and warriors. (If I recall correctly, it wasn’t even Native Americans who first objected to the use of these team names.) I still remember, back in the Dark Ages when I was attending the University of Oklahoma, our mascot was “Li’l Red.” His real name was Kirk Kickingbird. He was 100% Native American, proud of his heritage, and he danced at our games. He wore a beautiful red-and-white feathered costume that he’d made himself, and danced a real tribal war dance. Or did until somebody somewhere decided it was not politically correct for him to do so.
I’m reminded of those people who take offense at almost anything and have twisted society into knots trying to avoid “offensive” Halloween costumes or “triggers” on college campuses or any place in public. It begins to feel like the tail wagging the dog.
Okay, that’s a lot to chew on. But the Bieber thing really set me off. What are your thoughts? Is it cultural appropriation? Is cultural appropriation bad?
johnthecook…To The PiedType, you hit this 6penny nail squarely on the head and drove it deep into the hard wood! There is no controversy to it…just the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Well said!
Thanks, John. I appreciate that.
I don’t see anything wrong with Bieber or anyone else embracing a different culture or adopting elements of a different culture or custom as long as there is no menace intent. I am no Irish, but I celebrate St. Pat’s day; I am not Asian, but I learned to cook Asian cuisine and occasionally host with Asian food. I am not Indian, but I have a sari and wear it in summer. I see absolutely nothing wrong with it. I see it as cultural appreciation.
I agree with you. While a hairstyle might not rise to the level of cultural appreciation, neither does it fall to the level of cultural appropriation IMHO. I don’t see how you can live in a melting pot like the US and still claim cultural appropriation.
With trump not the center of the news everyday (I love waking up and not thinking to myself, “I wonder what trump’s done now?”), we’re see a lot more stupid sh*t like this all the time. Who cares? I know I sure don’t. At some point in time, throughout history, cultures have “appropriated” styles, or whatever, all the time. People really need to focus on more important things in their lives than Bieber’s hair.
If the Earth were a lot smaller, we’d probably all look alike already. Like a giant Borg, we’d all be assimilated.
Think that you have the answer there Susan, that we will indeed all be assimilated. With the surveillance going on at such a speed, are we all being judged on the way we look already? Great post by the way 🙂
There’s always someone out there who will judge the way you look. It’s a big part of our first impression when we meet someone for the first time.
Thanks for the compliment. I really just had to get that off my chest.
Cultural appropriation. I do not believe it is cultural appreciation…to explain why would require a great deal more coffee.
Enjoy your coffee. Your “vote” has been counted.
To me, Bieber’s hair just looks dirty and unkempt. I prefer kempt.
I agree. I also prefer kempt facial hair — either well-groomed or nonexistent. Have never liked the “stubble” look.
I just totally agree with this post. It says it all.
Thanks. That’s reassuring to hear.