The January 6th hearings begin

16 thoughts on “The January 6th hearings begin”

    1. I’ll keep watching. At least that’s the current plan. Wouldn’t want to miss anything new and interesting. Besides, I prefer seeing things for myself rather than relying on third-party interpretations that I might or might not agree with.

  1. While I share your bias and your cynicism, I nitpick your headline to suggest the committee’s presentation is not a hearing but a telling.

    And a telling in the era of TikTok and Murdoch, is by necessity, not as dry and sly as what did the President know and when did the President know it.

    The committee is fighting an information war on a low information battlefield, so new strategy and tactics are called for.

    And of course any calling out of Trump culpability and the cult like lockstep of the former President’s Grand Old Party co-conspirators will, by comparison, place Democrats in a light favorable… that consequence doesn’t suggest this telling is being told just to tilt the mid-terms Blue.

    Politics has a hard calendar. As Donald Trump knew…and so acted upon Jan 6th.

  2. I came away from viewing that first hearing thinking I hadn’t heard anything I didn’t already know much as your reaction. I also concur that first session did not seem to be what I thought a hearing to be. I also share your anger toward the handling of issues related to our ex-President. I’ll reserve comment about what I think might account for why judicial action has not been taken since he left office. I plan to watch the rest of the hearings so will see how they proceed.

    1. I’m watching the second hearing as I write, and plan to watch all the telecasts. As I’ve noted before, I prefer to watch for myself rather than rely on someone else’s interpretation of what happened.

  3. “I’m watching the second hearing as I write” — Me too.  My latest impression is that we’re witnessing a perfectly ordinary government function that should be reserved for serious issues, but instead is devoted to debunking an absurdly idiotic claim that was (and is still being) made by a certifiable moron.  Apologies to morons everywhere.

    1. Last night I caught the better part of the program about the Watergate hearings, most of which I didn’t watch at the time. It made me more determined to watch the current hearings, although those who most need to watch and learn probably won’t. After all, how important could this be if Fox isn’t covering it?

  4. Did you see the hearing yesterday? (Monday, June 13) It was great! Barr totally threw trump under the bus. And the big reveal about the Big Rip-Off? Have to say, I didn’t see that coming. I figured even as crooked and corrupt as they are, they’d at least create a fund under the name trump is promoting. That is wire fraud and all who helped to promote donating to “Stop the Steal” or whatever the name was, is guilty of wire fraud. Most importantly, trump. $250 million scammed from donors for a fund that did not exist.

    1. The man should have been imprisoned years ago. I don’t know how such a crook has remained free for so long, or, frankly, how anyone has continued to believe him after all he’s done. It was obvious ten years ago how he operates … and then there was the birther thing. And now, inciting an insurrection and attempted coup. Tax evasion got Al Capone; maybe they’ll get Trump for that.

      Anyone who has ever worked for him in any capacity had best turn on him now, or they’ll go down with him (and they might anyway).

Leave a Reply to SusanRCancel reply