AI discusses Pied Type

12 thoughts on “AI discusses Pied Type”

  1. It sounds altogether human, including ideal voices! Isaac Asimov might peg what we now know as AI as a significant step towards the “positronic brain” for robot intelligence that he envisioned. For me, this passes the Turing test. That’s not to say I think the Turing test is actually valid, but it is undoubtedly a milestone. BTW, I agree with AI’s opinion about your blog – it’s about the wonder of life, which is why I’ve been a long-time fan.

    1. I appreciate your long-time support; you’re one of very few who’ve stuck around this long, who didn’t get bored or distracted and drift off to other interests.

      Yep, I found this dialogue stunning. Had no idea AI could be programmed to do something like this. Two different, very natural sounding voices carrying on a very natural sounding conversation about a designated target. It is a bit scary to think I could be carrying on a conversation with AI and think I was talking to a person. Just the other day I was asking questions, in an online text dialog, at my insurance company. I’ve always known or assumed that such arrangements are chatbots. But this one had gotten so good that I actually wondered if it might have been a human on the other end. For that matter, the tax lady I was just talking to on the phone could have been AI or will be someday soon. Given the natural sounding dialog above, who knows. If not today, maybe next month …

  2. I agree absolutely with what your son says: this is equally astounding and horrifying, Colorado.
    I mean, “an eclectic mix” ???!!!

    1. Yep, having it understand what I’ve written and then playing two roles having a conversation about it — it’s mind-blowing. It’s obvious that already, today, you could be carrying on a conversation with “someone” you think is a human, when it’s actually AI. That’s really unnerving. There’s no way to know if it’s telling you the truth or inventing some dangerous lie. For now I suppose it depends on what the programmer tells it to do (I trust my son), but if the programmer has ill intent, who knows.

        1. Well, we need to stay alert for sure, although it appears at times we just won’t be able to tell from the sound of it. There are already so many kinds of scams out there. You just can’t be too careful.

    1. I don’t see how anyone with half a brain could hear this and not be immediately unnerved. Certainly this capability could be very useful to well-intentioned people, but in the hands of the ill-intentioned … yikes!

    1. Me too. It’s scary to think how easily I could be fooled by some malevolent AI and never realize it. This is light years beyond not believing before-and-after photos or “photographic evidence.”

Leave a Reply to MRCancel reply