A woman’s take on Herman Cain

2 thoughts on “A woman’s take on Herman Cain”

  1. I agree with your post, Pied. When this whole thing blew up I commented elsewhere that it seemed to be high “entertainment”, and then felt guilty for doing so because Cain is only accused, not proven to be a predator of women. The circumstantial evidence seems overwhelming to me, but it is only that plus “he said, she said”. He is using the Clarence Thomas defense of deny, deny, deny. It worked for him, and it might work for Herman too. As for me, I find Anita Hill completely convincing.

... and that's my two cents