Stick a fork in GM

GMlogoGeneral Motors declared bankruptcy today. In the past I’d have said it was the end of an era, but I know now that bankruptcy is not necessarily The End.

I haven’t followed the details of all the recent GM talk so maybe my questions have already been answered out there somewhere. I’m wondering why we gave them so much bailout money when clearly they were failing and had been failing for many years. Was that all just money down a rat hole? I was quite willing to let them fail last fall, rather than spend a ton of money just delaying the inevitable.

We saved jobs? Really? For how long? If GM keeps building cars like they’ve been building, nothing will change. The cars won’t sell, the “new” GM will fail, and the jobs will still be lost.

Apparently the government ends up owning a big chunk of the company after the dust settles. Goodie. A US-government-built car? That’ll be a hit. Or maybe they mean the taxpayers will own the company. That’s no better. It wasn’t my choice to buy shares in a failing car company.

Bottom line, it seems to me, is that nothing the government can do, nothing GM can do, nothing the UAW can do, is going to make Americans walk into those showrooms and buy GM cars. The buyers decided years ago that GM products weren’t what they wanted. They tried and fell in love with other cars from other manufacturers. GM had many years to woo those customers back and failed miserably. I can’t imagine anything changing now.

So much talk about today’s global economy and how the markets are changing and imports and exports are the way of the world now. Jobs are going overseas, companies are international, American calls to customer service are routed to India and elsewhere. But still we spend a fortune to keep a failing old-school American relic on life support because it’s an “icon”? Because it’s “too big to fail”?

Come on, somebody. Get real. GM belongs in a museum.

Also on Pied Type:

The bailout boondoggle, GM, and me me me

2 thoughts on “Stick a fork in GM

  1. Hey 30,
    I dont think the bail out was ever about changing the obvious train wreck that GM is/was. I think it was about expanding government real estate. Yeah, that makes me pretty cynical – but I can’t see any other reason for it. As you say, it was never going to turn around, if it’s obvious to us, it must be obvious to Congress and the President as well, right? So what other purpose could there have been. And if this is the case, then along with our government cars, we’ll have government credit cards, government airlines and maybe even a government McDonalds’? I have to say, I’m loving the new socialist America – 🙁
    All right, all right, I’m drawing the line right here and now. The government better keep its paws off my Taco Bell!!

... and that's my two cents