I know you think you know what you see but what you see is not what you think

10 thoughts on “I know you think you know what you see but what you see is not what you think”

    1. Maybe they thought Escher concepts were so ubiquitous and well known as to not need mention. Personally I’d like to know more about the creation of this particular photographic interpretation, which I find even more intriguing than Escher’s original. And thanks for the link, btw. I don’t recall having read the biography before now.

... and that's my two cents