Skip to content


  1. I thought that term limits applied to POTUS, I hope that hasn’t changed.

    By the bye, I read something that shocked me the other day,

    Our Prime Minister, Mr Malcolm Frazer, does not get his $530,000.00+ salary per annum, It all goes straight to charity, every cent.

    Still I suppose he claims it as a tax deduction on whatever he gets from his personal income on his meagre wealth of $200 million plus


      • Good bad or indifferent the justices of the Supreme Court as political appointments at the whim of whoever POTUS is when one of the chairs is vacated, seems very wrong to me, but then I’m an alien


        • I don’t like it either. When I was much younger and very naive, I thought the justices were above political affiliations and loyalties and made their decisions based only on their interpretations of the law. Like I said … very naive.


          • johnthecook…I do not think that you were so naive,as I also had the same idea. I believe that we were just under educated in how our political system works in practice and not just theory. I now know that interpretations are like noses.Mine is different than yours and who is to say your right and I am wrong or visa versa, in our interpretation of a decision?


      • I can see both sides of the term-limits argument for Congress. There is a learning curve to every job and theirs is no exception. Experience is vital to getting anything meaningful done. But I do strongly believe there should be limits for SCOTUS. No human being should have that much power. I would favor an age limit of 80 and a term limit of, say, 13. (No multiple of 4.)


        • Congress ought to be term limited too. The Founding Fathers never intended it to be a lifetime job. It was supposed to be ordinary citizens who took a few years off their regular jobs to serve the country, before returning to their “day jobs.” Experience in Congress ultimately becomes power and permanence, nice for constituents and donors, but not necessarily what’s right for everyone else. Besides, the current system has become one of constant campaigning for the next election, rather than focusing on work that needs to be done.


  2. johnthecook…I Think we can agree on this,term limits can be a good thing. It seems our politicians have found a way to extend their time in public office by a smoke and mirror tactic that all good magicians have seamed to master. If we the people who voted a person into a public office truly wanted that person out of office,just vote them out of office at the end of their first term OR recall them out of office via a referendum Where there is a will there is a way.


    • But term limits would ensure that regardless of votes, they could only serve two terms, or whatever. That would make them stick to business and stop planning for the next election. The founders never intended elective office to be a lifetime job.


Now that I've had my say ...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: