Exxon Valdez: The nightmare returns

Image CC gambier20 (Flickr)

Watching the news about that Gulf oil slick today has been making me sick. Almost physically ill.

I knew when that rig collapsed last week that a leak was inevitable. But since then the report has gone from one leak to three, and from 1,000 barrels a day to 5,000.

I knew it was inevitable that some amount of drifting oil would find its way ashore somewhere, eventually. It didn’t take long for the predictions to say the oil would first come ashore on the Mississippi delta. Today, the latest reports are saying the oil is less than six miles from the southeastern-most Louisiana coast, and that the residents of New Orleans, who are much farther inland and up river, can smell the oil.

Booms, burning, skimmers, and dispersants are being employed with very limited success. The winds are too high for much burning, and the oil slick too thin. And there aren’t enough booms in the world to corral a spill reportedly the size of the Delaware and Rhode Island combined. Three remote-operated underwater vehicles have been unable to cap the well, a task that was supposed to have been accomplished by an automatic blowout preventer when the Deepwater Horizon rig collapsed.

At least ten wetland wildlife refuges in Louisiana and Mississippi are in the path of the slick, as are the fishing grounds for Louisiana’s fish, oyster, lobster, and crab industries. Throughout the marshlands of the Gulf coast, birds are nesting and broods are hatching. And the entire region is still trying to recover from Hurricane Katrina.

This is so going to be much worse than the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, where the oil drifted onto rocky coasts that could be steam cleaned and scoured. This week’s spill is going ashore in sea-level wetlands and marshes with dense vegetation — the kind of terrain that supports a heavier, more diverse wildlife population than any other. You can’t steam clean vegetation. You can’t catch and hand wash the myriad sea creatures, amphibians, reptiles, mammals and birds that inhabit an area like that. You probably can’t even find most of them. With tides rising and falling in the area, flowing in and out of bayous and estuaries and washing over broad tidelands, the oil will be spread over an area far broader than the well-defined coast of Alaska’s Prince William Sound.

In the back of my mind I keep hearing Sarah Palin gleefully chanting, “Drill, baby, drill.” Such irresponsibility, to wish more of this on any of our coastlines.


Related Pied Type posts:

Image CC gambier20 (Flickr)

7 thoughts on “Exxon Valdez: The nightmare returns

  1. Seems that man will never learn from the past.
    That this will be worse than the Valdez just blows my mind.
    I didn’t think that was even possible.
    Never underestimate the ability of man to find bigger and better ways to destroy more and more of the planet.

    1. DOH, make that the Wall Street Journal. HuffPo is just reporting. My bad. No caffeine yet today.
      Halliburton, eh? Funny how that name keeps cropping up, and never in regard to anything good. Maybe this time they won’t be able to weasel out of their responsibility. As for BP, British Petroleum, who operated the rig, James Carville quipped the other day that the oil giant was about to become LP, Louisiana Petroleum. That’s good. Louisiana is going to need a new source of income after their wetlands and fishing industry are destroyed.

      WSJ and CNN also have been reporting that the well didn’t have a remote-control acoustic shutoff switch to backstop the other safeguards. Some other oil-producing countries require it, but not the U.S., because the oil companies objected to the expense, naturally. Those three underwater robots are now struggling to accomplish directly what could have been done remotely from the surface, had such a switch been installed.

... and that's my two cents