Perpetual war, perpetual power

CNN’s Fareed Zakaria is one of the few remaining good things about this flailing, failing news network. He is intelligent, thoughtful, knowledgeable, and in every way professional. His commentary on this morning’s “GPS” was notable for its explanation of just how big our paranoid Department of Homeland Security has grown — even as the U.S. is drawing down its efforts in Afghanistan. DHS, like every other government agency, has in its genetic makeup a “self-perpetuation” reflex. If it doesn’t have a legitimate reason for its continued existence and expansion, it will make one up. It will continue to fight “terrorism” here at home even if the only terrorists it can lay its hands on are innocent Americans going about their daily lives. Governments don’t willingly give up power once they have it. Besides, there are jobs to protect …

Vodpod videos no longer available.

(If the video doesn’t display properly, it can be viewed here)

The transcript:

Whatever you thought of President Obama’s speech on Afghanistan this week, it is now increasingly clear that the United States is winding down its massive military commitments to the two wars of the last decade.

We are out of Iraq and we will soon be largely out of Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden is dead, and al Qaeda is a shadow of its former self. Threats remain but these are being handled using special forces and intelligence. So, finally, after a decade, we seem to be right-sizing the threat from terrorist groups.

Or are we?

While we will leave the battlefields of the greater Middle East, we are firmly committed to the war on terror at home. What do I mean by that? Well, look at the expansion of federal bureaucracies to tackle this war.

Since September 11, 2001, the U.S. government has created or reconfigured at least 263 organizations to tackle some aspect of the war on terror. Thirty-three new building complexes have been built for the intelligence bureaucracies alone, occupying 17 million square feet – the equivalent of 22 U.S. Capitols or three Pentagons. The largest bureaucracy after the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs is now the Department of Homeland Security, which has a workforce of 230,000 people.

The rise of this national security state has entailed a vast expansion in the government’s powers that now touch every aspect of American life, even when seemingly unrelated to terrorism. Some 30,000 people, for example, are now employed exclusively to listen in on phone conversations and other communications within the United States.

In the past, the U.S. government has built up for wars, assumed emergency authority and sometimes abused that power, yet always demobilized after the war. But this is, of course, a war without end.

So we continue to stand in absurd airport lines. We continue to turn down the visa applications of hundreds of thousands of tourists, businessmen, artists and performers who simply want to visit America and spend money here, and become ambassadors of good will for this country. We continue to treat even those visitors who arrive with visas as hostile aliens – checking, searching and deporting people at will. We continue to place new procedures and rules to monitor everything that comes in and out of the country, making doing business in America less attractive and more burdensome than in most Western countries.

We don’t look like people who have won a war. We look like scared, fearful, losers.

— Fareed Zakaria, CNN

________

Also on Pied Type:



Categories: Constitution, Law, Politics, privacy

7 replies

  1. I completely agree with you, PT, on Fareed Zakaria, with his take on the DHS, and with his conclusion about America’s gross over-reaction to 9/11. He often writes columns for Time Magazine and I have yet to see anything but the highest quality of insight, research and reasoning from him. Rana Foroohar is not far behind him either. I don’t know where these people with the funny names came from, but as with our funny-named president, I’m glad they’re here.

    You and some readers know how I have often railed over the creation of DHS, that strange and unnecessary bureaucratic layer as well as its sibling, the Directorate of National Intelligence (another oxymoron). I find it ironic that the party of smaller and less-intrusive government concentrates on lessening business and financial regulation while steadfastly ignoring the creation of these monstrous and unjustified bureaucratic intrusions into privacy and freedom. I have heard not one word from any candidate about diminishing them. Mr. Romney is heavy on generalities and almost non-existent on specifics.

    • We’re in total agreement on the absurdity of DHS and everything that has issued from it. And yes, it was the GOP’s bulldog determination to butt into my private life that drove me out of the “party of small government.” It’s amazing how they keep finding more ways to intrude. Personally, I think the party is digging its own grave in American politics … but maybe that’s just wishful thinking.

  2. He is one of my favorites, too. It was one of his shows that showed the two types of insurance in other countries: Switzerland and Thailand.

    Our paranoia is going to destroy us. So… 30,000 employed just to listen in on phone conversations? I’d say that “Big Brother” most definitely has arrived. I’m sure they monitor, or at least check my site from time to time since I’m so outspoken. Who knows…..

    And to deny so many Visa’s… think of the billions of dollars we turn away at our borders. (sigh)

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." ~ Edmund Burke

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: