Determined Obama hits the ground running

3 thoughts on “Determined Obama hits the ground running”

  1. RE: #21. Does that include the regulation on allowing firearms in National Parks that you blogged about a while back? I was actually having another discussion about that and I remembered your opinion. I was going to find that post again but then read this one.

    You may have guessed that my original comment on that issue was worded from the mind of a hunter near the end of the hunting season. As fall turned to winter went on I moved onto different activities and the hunting mentality started to recede.

    Now, as I think more on the subject, I don’t consider it an issue of hunting rights or gun control. I think it is more about states rights. To begin the story, a sizable amount of States (Colorado included) voted on their own set of laws to govern firearms in the state. In why I consider a very compromising deal (between total gun control and no gun control), they voted to issue a Conceal and Carry Permit to select individuals who were educated and could demonstrate a respect for their rights and the safety of others. When passed, persons with this permit are allowed to carry a concealed firearm anywhere in the state. (Hundreds of people with this permit include law enforcement and security guards–through this law do they gain an attribute that helps advance their careers.)

    However, the National Park service (which as we knows, follows its chain of command through the Department of Interior and then to the Executive Branch of the Federal Government) decided they could override the laws of these States by not recognizing C/C permits on Federal land.

    I’m not ignorant to separate issues where Bush has expanded the power of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government beyond constitutional limits, believe me. But in this rare situation I think he has stood up for the rights of States.

    Public Land is a wonderful gift to the people of America and a great achievement by the power of democracy. But the balance of power and rights of states is something that is embedded in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, a balance that Jefferson and Madison devoted their entire life to keeping equal.

    Again, the issue in question isn’t about liberals vs. conservatives. It is about Washington and the Fifty other cities that they are supposed to work with on equal terms.

    [Yes, it includes the gun law I’ve mentioned before. The Bush/NRA proposal would have loosened National Park Service regulations to align them with whatever state and local gun laws are in effect around each park.

    Because this proposal never made it into the National Register, it will not become law. The existing NPS regulations will continue in effect. When entering a national park, anyone with a gun must unload it and store it in an inaccessible place such as the trunk of a car.

    Please note again that this regulation applies to guns in national parks only. Hunting has never been allowed in national parks because their function is to protect and conserve the wildlife and other natural resources within their boundaries. The much more extensive BLM, Forest Service, and state-owned lands have different purposes and different regulations.

    The NPS is, as the name says, national. Its lands are federally owned. Its rules and regulations supersede state and local laws.]

Go ahead, you can say it ...