A number of sources have now reported that Trump’s name appears as often as 1,300 times in the Epstein Files. And yet we’ve not seen a single example. No references, no context, no related quotes from others. In fact, some of those documents have now reportedly disappeared. One in particular included the testimony of a victim who said she’d been assaulted by Trump.
Pictures like these have emerged, but we still have no context. And these only show friendships, not assaults or abuse or pedophilia.
Rep. Dave Minn, a member of the Oversight Committee, said today on CNN that the Department of Justice, under the orders of Pam Bondi, is withholding more than 3,000 such documents.
Files are being illegally hidden, withheld, lost, or even destroyed, apparently all in an effort to keep Trump’s name out of the Epstein story.
Nevertheless, from all those actions, we can draw and are drawing certain conclusions about what’s in those files. And sooner or later we will know for sure.
johnthecook…IF President Trump is guilty of said allegations, he will be no better than President Kennedy, President Johnson and President Bill Clinton, just to name a few. Oh, let’s not forget FDR as well.
To the best of my knowledge they were philanderers, not pedophiles.
johnthecook…I did not know that President Trump was a pedophile. Was he ever convicted in a court of Law, or is he just suspected of being a pedophile? President Kennedy, President Bill Clinton, and FDR were well known to be womanizers, and President Trump may well be one of them, and LBJ did have one or more of illicit affairs outside the bonds of marriage with one or more women.
We’ve no proof that he’s a pedophile. We only know that he was best buddies with Epstein and ran with that crowd for many years. He and the Justice Department have for a number of years been hiding and withholding all the Epstein files, every single document that mentions him in any way. Some sources say there are more than 3,000 such documents being withheld. Now why would anyone do that if they were innocent, if those records said nothing negative about them? I drew my conclusions a long time ago.
right
And besides, those documents are being withheld in direct violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. If Trump has nothing to hide, why aren’t those documents being released?
right
I hope you’re right, that the truth will come out, but I’ll be surprised if it does. Why? Trump now has firm control of the Justice Department. Its name no longer describes it.
Maybe he thinks that if he can stall the release long enough, he’ll be able to finish his term. But the longer he stalls, the more obvious it becomes that he’s hiding something really incriminating. Maybe the stalling, the contempt of Congress will bring him down before that.
I agree with Jim: I think you’re never going to see what’s needed. There will probably be more, but the redaction will render them useless. And that’s not talking about the stuff that’s going to be destroyed.
If both Trump and the Justice Department continue to hide relevant papers, they’re both in violation of the law and they can both go take a long walk off a short pier together. I’ve had it up to here with this crap and we’ve still got 3 years to go, assuming we’ll have any semblance of a Nation for 3 more years.
I’m an outlander, I know, Colorado: but I can scarcely believe there are enough Americans who WILL NOT take steps – e.g., the military – in bringing these absolute criminals to heel that you’re all still in awful danger.
Sadly, the president, a draft dodger, is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. They all answer to him and/or his equally unqualified appointees. If Democrats could take over both houses of Congress in November, they might be able to impeach him and get rid of him.
The preferred LEGAL way. It’s my possibly ridiculous opinion that the generals are, in fact, waiting to see if said legal way will prevail; but if the “administration” destroys the election process and ‘triumphs’ they might just pull their fingers out.
These days, nothing is too ridiculous to consider.