Wouldn’t happen here

8 thoughts on “Wouldn’t happen here”

    1. I don’t get it either. They’re environmentalists …but in no way affecting or attacking the oil industry they’re objecting to. I guess they’re just trying to get attention because this doesn’t in any way show what they are against.

    1. Maybe they thought that because Stonehenge was a focal point this week (solstice observation) that they’d have a big audience. But for what? It’s certainly not specific to their cause.

      But I do remain impressed that bystanders tried to stop them. Like those bystanders,I’m outraged that anyone would lay a finger on Stonehenge.

  1. The ‘protest’ movement, in its entirety, is a total furphy; one has only to consider those ‘protesting’ on behalf of the Palestinians, and the likelihood of their being successful (in exactly WHAT ?!). Their thinking doesn’t include cause or development because neither would support their activity.
    Protesting is a way of sticking it to The Establishment, whatever and whoever it is, and of making oneself feel important.

    1. I’d say your last four words are about all most protesters accomplish. If it’s something massive and widespread, say when thousands march in Washington, then maybe something gets done. But only maybe. The pro-Palestinian protesters on campuses turned out to be more vandals and troublemakers than anything else.

Go ahead, you can say it ...